Federal Research Designations. Your Support Matters Body Your gift of Ability affects everything we do every day at Shirley Ryan AbilityLab — from the highest-quality clinical care and groundbreaking research to community programs that improve quality of life.
Give Now. Stories of support. Taking Authority Over Chronic Pain. For Patients Have any questions? Request Appointment. Find a Doctor Find a Location. Refer a Patient.
Have a Question About Click for Content Navigation. AbilityLab menu. Last Updated September 26, Atomized Content. Link to Instrument Instrument Details. Acronym RPQ. Also, anytime there is mention of a particular table, figure, appendix, or section, you RPQ by Rasch … f. The questionnaire was first of its kind when published in , and has since been cited in hundreds of academic publications with an increasing trend.
Journal of the Inernational Neuropsychological Society. We would like to know if you now suffer any of the symptoms listed below. The Rivermead Post Concussion Symptoms Questionnaire: a measure of symptoms commonly experienced after head injury and its reliability J Neurol. Read More. DOI: Mild head injury in sports: Neuropsychological sequelae and recovery of function.
As many of these symptoms occur normally, we would like you to compare yourself now with before the accident. Toll-Free U. Your gift of Ability affects everything we do every day at Shirley Ryan AbilityLab — from the highest-quality clinical care and groundbreaking research to community programs that improve quality of life.
Philanthropic support truly drives our mission and vision. Instrument Details. Recommendations for not administering RPQ or BDI-II in isolation for diagnostic purposes due to significant difference higher scores found between depressed and nondepressed TBI patients on self-reported mood, cognitive, somatic, and visual postconcussion symptoms Hermann et al. The Rivermead head injury follow up questionnaire: a study of a new rating scale and other measures to evaluate outcome after head injury.
Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery, and Psychiatry. Find it on PubMed. Clinical Rehabilitation. Hermann N, Rapoport M, et al. J Neuropsychiatry Clin Neurosci. Early prediction of persisting post-concussion symptoms following mild and moderate head injuries.
The poor single factor model suggests that ettes, expectations regarding increased need to use reports of post-concussion symptoms cannot be compensatory memory strategies were elevated for viewed in simple terms as a tendency to report the head injury vignette in that study. More generally, symptoms in general.
As such, aetiological accounts reactions to symptoms themselves in terms of of the development and maintenance of PCS may attributions and coping strategies are cited as playing need to incorporate mechanisms explaining why an important role in their persistence or resolution some symptoms seem to cluster together in this way, over time [e.
This may contribute to certain symptom With these points in mind, the cumulative fre- reports tending to cluster together.
Cognitive symp- quencies of RPQ scores in the present sample shown toms in particular may be more coherent with ideas in Figure 1 might provide some means of classifica- about the consequences of head injuries and therefore tion.
For comparison, the mean RPQ the relative emphasis of different clusters of symp- total for a non-clinical sample of adults in the general toms, potentially assisting with identifying similarities population [14] was 5. However, these of individual symptoms such as headache. The cur- bands are provisional and await further research to rent results suggest that subjective cognitive symp- examine their sensitivity and specificity against gen- toms may show some degree of separability from eral and clinical populations, as well as their corre- emotional and somatic ones, whilst still being related spondence to quality of life and general functioning.
The significance of this with respect to per- A number of methodological criticisms of the formance on neuropsychological tests or more gen- current study may be noted. Firstly, as the current eral e. However, whilst persistent subjective regarding the representativeness of the sample.
Indeed, meta-analyses of the cognitive amnesia. More generally, the association Emergency Department attendees in the USA after between subjective cognitive difficulties and objective MTBI [6], although that study also included young neuropsychological impairments is typically weak in children and older adults. Recruitment bias has the RPQ should be tempered by the extent to which it been demonstrated [52] in follow-up studies, where overlaps with broader symptomatologies of pain, fa- individuals with more significant injuries in terms of tigue and psychiatric disorders such as depression.
Litigation may different reasons subsequent to although not neces- reflect a further source of bias: we would advise sarily directly because of a traumatic brain injury, against use of the provisional classification bands notwithstanding the possible roles of expectations when using the RPQ in a medicolegal context. Caution should always In addition, different groups may conceivably be exercised in attributing persistent symptoms di- show different factor structures on questionnaires.
However, tant given the possibility that different symptoms comparative experimental studies of PCS across may improve at different rates [11]. However, the national boundaries have tended to focus on expec- similarities between the cognitive, emotional and tations of symptoms rather than those actually somatic factors across different populations with reported after TBI.
Appropriately matched longitu- different measures [15] and even in non-TBI pop- dinal cross-cultural studies are needed to compare the ulations [5, 62] is notable, particularly given the structure of post-concussion complaints and their differences between the measures and statistical resolution or persistence over time.
However, a high degree of covariation was There are also possible cross-cultural issues noted between the different symptom groups, partic- relating to generalisability. Whilst similarities in PCS ularly emotional and somatic symptoms. These across different countries have been cited [36], we are results reflect similar findings for other PCS instru- unaware of explicit experimental comparisons in the ments in different TBI and non-TBI populations.
References 1. Alexander MP Mild traumatic 7. Brain Cognition Postconcussive symptoms after tion. Brain Inj — Chan RCK Base rate of post- uncomplicated mild head injury. Binder LM, Rohling ML Money concussion symptoms among normal Head Trauma Rehab —59 matters: metaanalytic review of the ef- people and its neuropsychological 3. American Congress of Rehabilitation fects of financial incentives on recovery correlates. Clin Rehabil — Medicine Definition of mild after closed head injury.
Am J Psychiat J Head Trauma —10 tent postconcussion syndrome: The Rehab —87 9. American Psychiatric Association A review of mild head trauma.
Part I: mild traumatic brain injury. J Clin Exp Neuropsy- APA, Washington D. C chol — The Rivermead head injury fol- 5. J Syndrome Questionnaire with medical injury.
Brain Inj —33 Neurol Neuros Psychiatry — and psychiatric outpatients. Arch Clin Brain Inj Eames PG Distinguishing the J prediction of persisting post-concus- brain injury. Psychology Press, Symptoms and cognitive dys- Emanuelson I, Andersson Holmkvist E, whiplash syndrome. Acta Neurochir matic brain injury: a population-based women smokers of a link between Wien — study in western Sweden.
Acta Neurol smoking and cervical cancer: The role Health Psychol — logical complaint base rates of personal
0コメント